Davis Out On Bond
Save Email Print
Updated: 10:19 PM Jul 2, 2009
Davis Out On Bond
WTAP News
A Parkersburg woman facing pornography charges is out on bond Thursday.
Posted: 10:19 PM Jul 2, 2009
Reporter: Lauren Keeling
Email Address: lauren.keeling@wtap.com
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Lisa Location: Waverly on Jul 9, 2009 at 06:35 PM

TO Judy, I believe half the questions anonymous asked you, you went right around the questions that were asked. trust me on this one I never hide who i am, I do not need to.I havent done nothing wrong, Shirlene did. Like was said before by anonymous, you can make your weekly visits to the jail come sept....HAVE A GREAT DAY!!
Posted by: anonymous Location: parkerburg on Jul 9, 2009 at 07:13 AM

I read a comment on the first part, where she was arrested. She thought she was drugged. Where is the evidence from the hospital saying she was??????????? another pervert walking the streets.
Posted by: judy Location: PARKERSBURG on Jul 9, 2009 at 12:41 AM

to ANONYMOUS...I DID NOT SAY IT WAS ALRIGHT FOR ANYONE TO DO ANYTHING TO MY GRANDKIDS.I SAID THE KIDS SHOULD HAVE TOLD THE PARENTS IF THESE THINGS DID HAPPEN.I SAID MY GRANDKIDS WOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER IN THE FIRST PLACE. WHOEVER YOU ARE I COULD CARE LESS HOW U FEEL ABOUT MY FEELINGS,AND DON'T SIT THERE BEHIND ''ANONYMOUS''AND TELL ME I DON;T CARE ABOUT MY GRANDSONS.THEY SLEEP IN THEIR OWN BEDS AT NIGHT,WHERE THEY BELONG..........
Posted by: anonymous Location: parkersburg wv on Jul 8, 2009 at 10:13 AM

to Judy: you say you have grankids right? so your saying if Shirlene did this to any of your grandkids you wouldnt want her to be in trouble? it is ok for her to buy your grandkids alcohol? be apart of her filming your grandkids? buying them cigaretts? telling them all about scotts privates? i know you would want justice done as well unless you dont cere about any of your grandkids. why do you feel so strongly about her innocence? she is a fake when it comes to pretending of how she cares for children and you are obviously too nieve to see the true Shirlene. keep your grandkids away from her for their sake or you will learn the hard way. i dont care about you feeling but i do care about the children. you think children will tell you everything but sometimes they dont. they get threatned or sometimes just to scared to mention what is really going on. get a new friend unless you plan on making weekly visits to a prison.
Posted by: anonymous Location: Parkersburg on Jul 7, 2009 at 09:26 PM

The facts speak for themselves...videos do not lie.....FRY HER!!
Posted by: against child porn Location: Parkersburg on Jul 7, 2009 at 12:01 AM

This is a women,she is a grown adult.If she knew something was going on then she should of spoke up to one of the parents. She is disgusting.Once a perv always a perv.
Posted by: Lisa Location: Waverly on Jul 6, 2009 at 11:56 PM

JUDY...MY DAUGHTER DID TELL ME A FEW THINGS, LIKE THE ALCOHOL THAT WAS GIVEN TO THEM. SHE DID NOT TELL ME ABOUT THE VIDEO, BECAUSE AS A CHILD SHE THOUGHT IT WOULD OF BEEN HER FAULT.WHICH NONE OF THIS WAS HER FAULT. SHE WAS SCARED. SHE IS NOW IN THERAPY AND HAS BEEN, BUT THE TRUTH DID COME OUT. THE FOLLOWING MORNING WHEN SHIRLENE CALLED MY HOME AT 6 AM IN THE MORNING....BUT SHE FAILED TO LEAVE OUT HER PART IN IT ALL...CONTRIBUTING TO A MINOR IS A CHARGE ALL OF ITS OWN. All i can say is God be with her!!
Posted by: judy Location: parkersburg on Jul 6, 2009 at 10:04 PM

to Lisa in Waverly,the only thing i can say is if u talked to your daughter every daylike u say then why in the world didn't she tell u if things were going on? i have grandsons the age of the children envolved and i would bet my life that they would know better and not go along with anything like that.
Posted by: Lisa Location: Waverly on Jul 6, 2009 at 03:33 PM

JUDY. WHAT WAS SHIRLENE DOING NAKED AND DANCING IN A VIDEO SHOT BY SCOTT, WHEN THERE WERE KIDS IN THE ROOM. YOU CLAIM THIS CHILD WAS SHOVED IN FRONT OF THE CAMERA, EVEN WITH THAT LOGIC, THERE ARE THINGS CALLED A BATHROOM.ALSO THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW WHAT SHIRLENE SAID TO THESE CHILDREN ABOUT SCOTTS PRIVATE PARTS..SO OBVIOUSLY YOU DONT KNOW THE WHOLE FACTS YOURSELF...SHE KNEW WANT SHE WAS DOING, BECAUSE THEY HAVE HER TALKING TO THE KIDS AND SCOTT ALSO ON VIDEO..DO I HONESTLY THINK SHE BELONGS IN PRISON? AT FIRST YES I DID.I BELIEVE SHE NEEDS HELP....LIIKE I HAVE SAID BEFORE I TALKED TO MY CHILD EVERYDAY, IF SHIRLENE THOUGHT SHE OR THE GIRLS WERE IN DANGER, LIKE SHE TOLD ME SHE WAS AFRAID OF HIM, WHICH THAT COULD OF BEEN A COVER UP ON HER PART, I REALLY DONT KNOW.I WOULD OF SENT HER MONEY TO GET HER AND THE KIDS HOME SAFELY.
Posted by: anonmous Location: parkersburg wv on Jul 6, 2009 at 03:12 PM

guilty through her back in the cell and through the key away forever and ever....
Posted by: judy Location: parkersburg on Jul 6, 2009 at 12:05 AM

if the whole story about this case would have been told to the public by the media just maybe most of you wouldn't be so quick to judge Shirlene.it was never told to the public how the child was pushed in the view of that stupid camara by one of the other children.was it? and it was never told that Shirlene was in the living room when this happened.if she had anything to do with this don't u think she would have been with the girls?yes she may have been caught on his camara also but,not by choice and only because she must have went into the room to see what all the giggling was about.think about it people....you don't know the whole story but,yet you are ready to send her to prison.this is so unfair.put youself in her shoes for a minute and think about it.
Posted by: Kayla Location: Parkersburg on Jul 4, 2009 at 12:13 AM

I think this lady should have been set with no bond she has a very serious problem and is a pervert...She should had have to stay in the north central regional jail till her sentencing. Obviously she was guilty if she was saw on tape so that should pretty much be a automatic guilty...This lady should have had no bond and she had low bond for a very sick crime she had committed thats disguisting!!!
Posted by: anonymous Location: parkersburg on Jul 3, 2009 at 07:51 PM

i agree with karen on this. the bond reduction makes no sense. in the meantime there are people who have been set up from the gate for drug charges with bonds set so exorbitantly high it is an obvious eighth amendment violation. i can only hope the unfairness apparent in the justice system in this area is only an illusion.
Posted by: uhm Location: infredsface on Jul 3, 2009 at 07:40 PM

Fred you are an idiot at best. What or how do you know of Michael Jacksons alleged drug use....Simple townies being simple
Posted by: Michelle Location: Mtta on Jul 3, 2009 at 07:23 PM

You people are crazy!!!! I agree with not a friend. SHE IS ON TAPE!!!! As for the Michael Jackson He may have been guilty but he was aquited and those kid's parents agreed to be paid. If it were my kids ther wouldn't have to be a trial!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Children are GOD'S PRECIOUS GIFTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Page: